|
New Page 1
I have had an interest in
aging beer in oak barrels for some time. Not having access to a barrel, I
convinced Jim Mosser, owner of our local homebrew shop, to get a barrel
and conduct some research. Over the last 3 months Jim conducted some
experiments and documented the results. Here is a copy of his
documentation. -Terry
Terfinko ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oak
Barrel Experiment
I'd like to take a moment to address the
research end of the experiment. First of all, I have never encountered as
much misinformation or disinformation about any other aspect of brewing
than with these barrels. I've concluded that it's impossible, in many
cases, to separate the good info from the bogus info. Some of the info
almost seems to be generated by ego alone: i.e. "It's true because I say
so," etc. (that's a general statement only, folks!). Anyway, I finally
decided to forego all of the hoopla, and simply plug ahead on my own.
Having done that, here is a general chronology of what I've done to date.
About the experiment itself, I focused totally on the aging side of oak
barrel use, and not dispensing. An experiment with priming and dispensing
might happen at a later point, but I'm not really of the opinion, at this
time, that it's a practical idea.
First, the barrel. The one I
chose to work with was a 3 gallon barrel made of American white oak, which
was charred on the inside. It was built in New England, and was brand-new.
I went with a three gallon barrel because I figured that, since the
smaller the barrel, the higher would be the ratio of oak to beer. In other
words, if I could make this whole thing work with a 3 gallon barrel, a 5
gallon barrel would be even easier.
The first order of business was
to brew a batch of beer. To this end, I chose a pre-hopped beer kit
(Arkell's GWR Strong Bitter, manufactured by EDME), adjuncted with one
half pound of dry malt. The yeast used was a re-propogated bit of Chico
ale yeast. I opted for simplicity, because I wholly expected that I might
lose the batch of beer for one reason or another. This batch went well
enough, and spent nearly four weeks in primary and secondary fermenters,
at which point I prepared the barrel. First, I filled the barrel with
water. It leaked a bit, but after a few hours the wood swelled up, and the
leakage stopped. So far, so good. I then emptied the barrel and refilled
it a couple of times, just to clear out any excess bits of loose charred
matter.
At this point, I filled the barrel with hot water and a
substance called Barokleen, which is essentially a blend of soda ash and
lye. This stuff stayed in the barrel for three days. I then repeated the
process, as this was supposed to leach tannins out of the oak, and I'm
sure many of you have heard about perported high tannin levels in American
white oak. Anyway, after all of this, I soaked and rinsed the barrel with
cold clean water five or six times over the next few days, always leaving
the barrel full. I then sterilized the barrel with a blend of sodium
metabisulfite and citric acid (following the instructions on the package),
and re-rinsed the barrel about a half- dozen times after that with clean
cold tap water. Finally, I was ready to fill it with beer. I simply
siphoned directly from a carboy, put a stopper and airlock in the bung
hole, crossed my fingers and prayed to the beer gods for good
fortune.
From the get-go, I drew a small amount of beer each day,
to monitor the flavor. By day three, I began to notice the oak for the
first time, and it grew in intensity with each day. At day six the beer
had developed a marvelous balance, but by day eight it was becoming overly
oakey in character. Finally, I pulled the beer on day ten, and bottled it.
I simply rinsed the barrel out twice with cold water, and let it sit,
full.
Meanwhile, I had brewed a second batch of beer, this one a
barley wine. I had read more than once that with new barrels, it might be
advantageous to use high gravity beers the first couple of times, in order
to leave a beer "imprint" in the barrel. This beer was another kit: EDME
barley wine, along with a 1kg can of Morgan's dark crystal Master Blend,
and a re-propogated bit of Wyeast Scottish ale yeast. The starting gravity
was 1.072, and I gave it a two week primary fermentation in glass. I
prepared the barrel with the sodium metabisulfite and citric acid as
before, and rinsed it five or six times. I then racked the barley wine
into the barrel. After a couple of days, I dry-hopped the beer with 1/3oz
of Kent Golding pellets.
After two weeks, the beer had developed an
oak flavor, but not nearly as oppressive as the previous batch.
Furthermore, that first batch of beer (the Arkells), after a month in the
bottle, had begun to lose it's oakiness to the point that it has become
very drinkable. This has caused me to conclude that it's probably OK to
let the beer sit in the barrel, even if the oak flavor seems to reach an
excessive point, because that flavor does recede somewhat with aging. Now,
I have brewed a batch of imperial stout (O.G. 1.065), and that will be the
next beer to get the oak treatment, once I've decided to pull the barley
wine.
Finally, my conclusions to date. Well, as I expected, the
first batch was a little harsh, but certainly drinkable, and it has
improved in the bottle with age. The second batch is maturing beautifully,
and the oak flavor seems to have reached a peak and stayed there. I have
experienced no infection problems whatsoever, and, unless I have
overlooked something, it appears at this stage that American white oak
barrels are nothing to be afraid of, with regard to conditioning beer. The
oak flavor, of course, is, regardless of strength, a matter of personal
preference. Frankly, I have never tasted anything quite like it, and I am
becoming rather fond of it. Since it's a good idea to keep these barrels
full at all times, I'm simply going to keep putting batch after batch of
beer in there, and see what happens over time.
For all of you who
have contacted me about this subject, I want to express thanks for your
interest, and also your individual suggestions and offered information on
the subject. It's all been very helpful. For anyone interested in any
experiment updates from this point on, I can be reached at
1-(800)-900-8410. I also want to thank Terry Terfinko personally for
goading me into this experiment. I hope this information will be of value
to some of you. The experiment's been a lot of fun, and I've also learned
a bunch. Well, that's it for now. To all of you, Good Brewing!
by
Jim Mosser, May 1995 This was posted to Homebrew Digest #1747, June 2,
1995, by Terry Terfinko. |
|